![]() | |
Christian Siriano Spring 2010 |
![]() | ||
Christian Siriano Spring 2010 translated from the runway |
With the recent economic downturn, I can understand the sudden outburst of designers reaching out to mass market opportunities, but isn't the magic, the allure, the temptation of the luxury market is the fact that it is somewhat inaccessible? To see celebrities and people of a specific wealth and station parade around with these labels, in all of our minds, whether you admit to it or not, gives you something to want to upgrade to. Would the obsession over the Birkin bag still be there if they did a line of made-in-China purses for Sears? How exclusive are the red bottoms if you can get them from Macy's?
Another concern I have is about the quality. When you have such mass produced items are you sacrificing quality? Honestly, I do not want to spend $180.00 on a pleather jacket just because Donatella slapped a label on it and called it fashion. In a recent interview, Domenico Dolce of Dolce and Gabbana firmly stated that they had absolutely no interest in joining the fast fashion craze. He called it "cheap" and said that there's "no quality" and that these fast fashion companies just churn out looks. The duo had even recently offed their fusion line, D&G.
Now, I don't know about you, but I am not a lover of fashion just for a look. I hold these designers in high esteem, not because of their looks, but because of the attention and love each of them dedicate to their craft. In designing collections, they wield thread and needle like a paintbrush; creating pieces of art to be beloved by all. Whether you believe in the trickle up or trickle down theory, our top designers serve as mirrors of the cultural zeitgeist; compasses that point to the future of how we express ourselves. So are the designers telling us that cheap chic is the future? Are they expressing a "high fashion for all" mentality? If this true, then that's great, but in no way do I want to sacrifice quality for a label. I want to be able to invest, one day, in a Chanel suit that won't unravel on me once it's worn 2 or 3 times because I bought it from Forever 21. The luxury market is too precious to let it go to the dumps for quick cash. Let's preserve it. I almost made myself sick at the idea of throwing a Chanel-esque suit in the trash. But alas, the almighty dollar speaks louder than I ever could, and from the looks of it, fast fashion collabs are here to stay. What do you think? Let me know.
Love,
Ty
I completely agree. The exclusivity of very well recognized fashion staples such as Christian Louboutin red bottoms would definitely be compromised if they could easily be picked up from stores like Macy's or JC Penny's. And although it would be nice for young women, especially working mothers with financial responsibilities that don't always readily have the extra income to go shopping for high end labels such as Versace, Jason Wu, or Jimmy Choo, would it really be the same? I feel that in order to produce large quantities for stores such as Target, Payless, etc., there is a very big possibility that the quality of each product may suffer and eventually so will the overall integrity of the designers and their labels. So I'm in complete agreement that high end should stay high end, and people who want these labels should wait until they can afford the "real thing" rather than settle for the cheaper versions of them that may not last.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your insight.
ReplyDelete